February 25, 2025

Storytelling: Two Approaches to Characters

Our stories are living beings, equal partners in our passionate, purposeful, plain fun lives.

Our stories matter.

The process of telling them matters.

How do you learn to write?

You write. You think. You read.

Here are two novels to think about.

What do they share?

Christopher Moore. Fluke, Or I Know Why the Winged Whale Sings.

Harper Collins (paperback), 2004.

Moore shines in this goofy novel featuring marine biologist Nathan Quinn as he and his team investigate why humpback whales sing, only to have one literally ‘phone home.’ My book club members swore this is the strangest book they ever read, yet are still recommending it years later. Why? Moore’s skilled writing makes every sentence sing. Coleridge’s ‘willing suspension of disbelief’ is required here, making this a great example of accepting the author’s premise, then seeing if you buy it. But I accepted his premise, and where he took his story. Others didn’t buy the sunken city scenario. I think Moore’s world and his characters come alive. What else is there?

What I would have done: Honestly? I wish I’d written it. I’d consider it a life achievement. And Moore’s impassioned, educated plea to save the world’s whales? Icing on the cake—here’s a writer who believes he can make a difference, simply by making a story, and a species, live for us. In one brilliant novel, he did both.

Robin Oliveira. My Name is Mary Sutter. Viking. 2010.

A debut novel by a Seattle writer, it’s historical fiction about a young midwife who yearns to be a physician, and ends up a nurse and battlefield surgeon at the beginning of the Civil War. Mary perseveres through incredible hardship and opposition to women in medicine. Oliveira’s research revealed the hardship, filth (I kept yelling, “for crying out loud, wash your hands!”) and her passion is for the faceless women who nursed the wounded, and the few who later became surgeons. And that’s where I felt she lost her narrative thread, writing instead an emotional elegy to people who suffered through that terrible time without quite understanding what they were doing, or why. I loved this book. It was compelling and well written, but in the end I didn’t really know any of the characters, even Mary, and that was disappointing. Still, I keep thinking about them.

What I would have done: I would have shown us the characters as they struggled to make sense of their world and their choices, instead of making them stand-ins for national grief over painful, senseless loss of any war, especially one that divided America. Still, well done, and I’ll watch for her next book. ‘Show don’t tell.’

Two good writers. Two novels. They share a love of storytelling.

  • What worked for you?
  • Were the characters real?
  • Did you believe the story?
  • Where did it lose you?
  • Why?
  • What would you have done differently?
  • And, most important: how does the comparison help sharpen your own writing?

(c) 2011 Robyn M Fritz

Starbucks—Good Enough to Pee At

I used to be proud to say that I was one of Starbucks’ earliest clients, back when they opened their first store in Seattle. Even though I didn’t know what they were talking about until I acquired a taste for espresso in Spain, and brought home a stovetop espresso pot for my parents.

Starbucks was different in those days, at least I think so (but the coffee is just as bad). I was more idealistic and naïve, then, a lot less cynical. Or maybe I just wasn’t paying attention.

But now I’m officially done with Starbucks. It’s not the coffee or the people. It’s the $15 million.

This is Howard Schultz’s fault. I have no problem with people creating a good company and making a decent profit if they take care of their employees and their customers and their community. That’s how you build a healthy, balanced world. As long as we’re using money to drive it (another story).

I don’t think Starbucks does that any more.

Howard Schultz took home what, a $15 million bonus, the same year they closed stores and laid off employees? Really?

The second shocker: why do people put up with it? I’ve heard: ‘not interested, ‘it’s okay because they needed to cut stores, they needed to cut employees, and some of our neighbors and friends still have jobs,’ or ‘the economy is bad.’ Come on!

If any of that is true, why didn’t Schultz turn back his bonus to keep people in their jobs? That would be giving back to the community.

Yes, I admit that I’ve been to Starbucks once since I declared I’d never go back again. The dogs and I were on a road trip and we had to pee.

I say no to Starbucks, and I’m voting with my latte dollars. What do you think?

(c) 2011 Robyn M Fritz